Themes

The recent midterm elections dampened investor optimism around the pace of AI adoption. Over the past month, many AI-first companies have seen market cap declines of 30% or more, a pullback similar to what we saw in early 2025 when…

With shares of META moving higher on the potential behind Muse, it's worth noting the big picture; personalized AI subscriptions are an underappreciated AI growth lever. On the consumer side, I estimate only 2% of all daily internet users pay for an advanced model. While this opportunity directly benefits the frontier model companies, it is also a big opportunity for Meta and Apple, which are building personalized AI. For example, by 2030, I see a conservative case in which Apple increases its operating income in that year by 18% and an aggressive case in which it doubles it. For Meta, I see a conservative case of an additional 8% of operating income and an aggressive case in which it adds 80%. While the gap between conservative and aggressive is wide, it's built on a belief that these bots will be valuable to consumers and they'll be willing to pay for the technology. On the enterprise side, the average monthly AI spend per employee in the U.S. is only $13 versus the average software spend of $780, suggesting there's lots of room to grow.

This week, we received September quarter revenue guidance from two key AI infrastructure companies, ASML and TSMC, that came in about 5% above Street expectations. IBM’s small miss was far more significant in the minds of investors. June-quarter software growth came in at 5%, compared with expectations of 10%. Given IBM’s 40-year track record of consistently meeting estimates, that shortfall was treated as a major disappointment and sent shares down 25%. Ironically, the miss was a positive read on how early we are in the AI cycle. The weakness was driven in part by enterprise budgets shifting toward AI infrastructure. Despite all of this good news, AI stocks traded down about 6% this week, compared with a 2% decline in the Nasdaq. The AI trade is tired, which raises the question: What will get these stocks moving higher again? The answer is earnings.

Micron’s quarter was the latest datapoint that we are still early in the AI buildout, my sense is still in the second inning. Shares of MU traded up about 15% the day following earnings as August guidance came in materially ahead of Street expectations. Revenue in the May quarter grew about 370% y/y, and August guidance implies 340-350% y/y growth versus the Street at 285% underscoring the company is defying the law of large numbers. AI investors can rest well at night knowing Micron signed 16 strategic customer agreements (SCAs) in May, up from one last quarter, seven of which were large 5 year deals. This is important given it singles Micron customers believe the AI buildout has years to run.

The fundamentals of the AI trade continue to mostly exceed expectations, yet investors remain unimpressed. In the two trading days following better-than-expected earnings, ASML shares fell approximately 7%. Similarly, following its own beat, TSMC saw shares drop about 3% in a single day, all while the Nasdaq rose 2% over the same period. The bottom line: AI chip fundamentals are largely outperforming projections, but investors aren't rewarding these companies for their results. The reason? They fear the party is about to slow down or end entirely. The question I’m struggling with is: What will it take for these companies to win back investor favor?

I’ve obsessed about all things Apple for more than 20 years. When asked for Apple’s defining achievement, I’m tempted to talk about the iPhone. In reality, the answer is much deeper than a single product. Apple’s true achievement is the culture Jobs instilled that made the Mac and iPhone possible and has sustained the business long after the launch's. As Apple looks toward the decades ahead, investors can rest easy knowing that Jobs’ product discipline remains embedded in the culture, and that culture will be the foundation for future hit products.

A lot happened in 2025 when it comes to robotaxis, which makes it fitting to mark where things stand today between Waymo and Tesla. This year, Waymo moved beyond the pilot phase and entered the scaling phase, with a fully driverless service operating in five US cities and a fleet of around 2.5k vehicles. Tesla’s Robotaxi is running a fleet of around 50 vehicles, largely supervised in Austin and the Bay Area. While Waymo has the lead, the market remains nascent, likely exiting 2026 with about 1% of rides in the US, which means Tesla has plenty of time to catch up. For 2026, it will all come down to how the no safety driver Austin test goes. If that goes well, look out Waymo.

For the past month the market has been nervous that the AI bull market may be approaching an end. The latest pulse on that topic came this week from AWS re:Invent 2025. Amazon's message was clear, they are accelerating its AI buildout and agents will have a profound impact on the future of work. Unfortunately the market is not buying it, with shares of AMZN, GOOG, NVDA, MSFT, and META down an average of 0.5% in the day following the bullish comments from Amazon, while the Nasdaq is flat.

The market appears to be looking past the facts about how quickly AI is advancing, evidenced by NVDA shares being down 3% following better than expected earnings and guidance and the Nasdaq falling 2% over the past five trading days.…

One nagging question around AI is what the long-term business models will look like and whether these companies will be able to charge enough to become profitable. We looked at the ten most popular paid consumer subscription apps to get a better sense of historical pricing power. On average, their prices have increased 1.7% faster per year than the rate of inflation. The bottom line: this is good news for ChatGPT, Grok, Gemini, Claude and Perplexity, because it shows that if you get consumers hooked, you can gradually start raising prices.

The road to purchasing Meta Display led through a local Best Buy, where a mandatory demo was required to ensure proper fitting. In the end, I found the technology impressive, the use case still limited, and the fashion grade below average. The bottom line: Meta is making the right move by investing $20B annually into Reality Labs, but the return on that investment will take years.

Apple’s decision to shelve Vision Pro in favor of glasses underscores that the optimal AI-first form factor is still unsettled. Apple is now following Meta’s push into glasses, while Jony Ive joined OpenAI in May to pursue a different path: a screenless pocket companion. I believe the phone will remain the dominant AI-first device over the next three years. Beyond that, the shift will move toward pocket companions that work alongside phones and watches. Glasses, despite Apple’s pivot, are likely capped at a few hundred million units a year, limited by comfort, privacy, and fashion.