Our X poll found that only about 17% of US iPhone users use Siri daily, a low number considering the phone on average is interacted with a hundred-plus times a day. Today it's used for low-stakes tasks and not trusted as an assistant. Over the next year, that will begin to change with the new Siri expected to be available late this year in the US through an iOS 27 update. We found the feature to be slow in our beta testing over the past 20 days, which was more than offset by an AI assistant that just works. Ultimately, I believe the use of Siri, which is core to Apple's personalized AI, will be the foundation of the Apple devices' value proposition.

Google’s June quarter should have worked. Cloud revenue was up 82% y/y versus the Street at 63%. My first reaction was the stock should be up 5%. Instead, shares fell 7% in the two trading days following the print compared to the Nasdaq down 3%. The reason is investors are still stuck on the same two issues: capex and cloud margins. The company raised CY26 capex expectations by about 7% relative to the Street's and said significant investment will continue. On top of that, cloud margins are likely to decline in the back half of the year as Google uses third-party capacity to meet demand. My take is the capex and margin concerns are real near-term, but the more important point is that cloud demand is still running well ahead of supply.

Shares of TSLA were down 16% over the two days following the company's June results compared to the Nasdaq down 3%. The pressure came from two places: automotive gross margins and capex. Auto gross margins ex credits came in at 16.3%, below the Street at 18.5% and below the adjusted March quarter run rate of around 18%, breaking a five-quarter upward margin trend. The second issue is the company expects capex in 2027 to be “massive,” suggesting the Street's $21B estimate will be above $25B, pushing operating cash flow negative for the next six quarters. I believe those two issues are near-term in nature. The company will still have between $20B and $25B in cash at the end of 2027 compared to the $43.5B reported today (Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments), and most importantly is investing in high-growth, high-barrier-to-entry markets around physical AI.

Tesla’s June-quarter earnings have more moving parts than usual. The bottom line is the long term growth story is intact, with the negative wild card around how the Street thinks about greater capex. New topics this quarter include expectations around capex, where I expect management to guide higher for next year, and gaining better visibility into whether the surge in June deliveries is sustainable. The traditional focus areas still matter. 1. automotive gross margins excluding regulatory credits, which I expect to come in above the Street’s 18.5% consensus. 2. updates to robotaxi rollout. Tesla has added three cities in July, and I expect management to indicate another three cities before year-end, broadly in line with Street expectations. 3. I expect the Cybercab production ramp to shift from late 2026 into the first half of 2027.

This week, we received September quarter revenue guidance from two key AI infrastructure companies, ASML and TSMC, that came in about 5% above Street expectations. IBM’s small miss was far more significant in the minds of investors. June-quarter software growth came in at 5%, compared with expectations of 10%. Given IBM’s 40-year track record of consistently meeting estimates, that shortfall was treated as a major disappointment and sent shares down 25%. Ironically, the miss was a positive read on how early we are in the AI cycle. The weakness was driven in part by enterprise budgets shifting toward AI infrastructure. Despite all of this good news, AI stocks traded down about 6% this week, compared with a 2% decline in the Nasdaq. The AI trade is tired, which raises the question: What will get these stocks moving higher again? The answer is earnings.

The news that Apple is suing OpenAI to short-circuit OpenAI’s AI device initiatives has a wild undertone: Apple is effectively suing Jony Ive. While the complaint’s person of focus, OpenAI’s Tang Tan, does not report to Jony Ive, the two work together (Ive on design, Tan on hardware) to develop OpenAI’s future AI devices. If Apple deemed AI devices a hobby, it’s unlikely they would have taken this aggressive action against Ive’s initiatives. Bottom line: this is a win for Apple because, at a minimum, this will slow OpenAI’s efforts. At a maximum, it will end their device efforts. As for OpenAI, I’ve always viewed the hardware opportunity as optionality. Therefore, the setback has less of an impact on the company’s near-term valuation.

The framework for assessing the health of the AI trade has become a well-traveled road, centered on Cloud and capex outlook. Both carry equal weight in the conversation. We expect consensus CY27 hyperscaler capex growth estimates to increase from the current 23% y/y to 37%. As for Cloud, we expect upside in June for Google Cloud and AWS growth, and an in-line print for Azure. The bigger question is less about the magnitude of the upside and more about whether investors will reward the AI trade based on the improved outlook. My sense is yes, given these higher expectations should drive AI infrastructure earnings growth that more than offsets multiple compression related to the law of large numbers. P.S. Oracle, the emerging cloud entrant with 4% market share, won't report its August quarter until mid-September.