Nvidia reports its July quarter results on Wednesday, August 26. I expect them to do what they have done over the past few quarters: beat by 4% and raise revenue guidance for October by 3%. Given that last quarter they began to break out data center growth between hyperscalers and ACIE, the topic of growth rate trends within those segments will be a focus. I believe investors will want to see hyperscaler growth rates above 80% y/y (vs. 115% last quarter) and ACIE above 150% (vs. 74% last quarter). In other words, investors want to see that the growth baton has been handed to ACIE, given that group has more potential to drive long-term growth. The one wildcard, SpaceX, which I estimate accounted for about 4% of revenue in July, has the potential to become a 10% customer by the end of CY27. That means that SpaceX alone can drive hyperscaler capex growth in CY27 to above 68%, compared to the Street, which is currently at 38%. As for the stock, it's in a catch-22. Any upside they produce makes the out-year growth more difficult, a dynamic that mutes any upside to shares.

This week, the new Grok 4.6 moved from 8th to 4th place on the key AI model intelligence leaderboard. That’s noteworthy because over the last couple of years the model has been between 6th and 15th place. The move to 4th is impressive, but in the AI model leapfrog game the future position is debatable. I believe Grok’s trend in model intelligence will continue to improve relative to the competition over the next 6 months, yielding a top spot early in 2027. That’s important because in the long term, premium models will enjoy pricing leverage.

SpaceX shares were down 14% after its first quarter as a public company, despite June revenue beating Street expectations by 13%. The primary reason for the slide is that capex in the September and December quarters will be about 65% above the Street. This is the same investor capex concern that has plagued big tech for the last year, around the prospects that spending will dilute profits into perpetuity. While the concern is valid in some circumstances, it does not apply to SpaceX, which has the most aggressive vision: building a vertically integrated AI company. Revenue guidance, which centered on a $100B revenue run rate exiting 2026, implies about $22B in the December quarter, about 17% above the Street. The bottom line is the SpaceX business has grown and will continue to grow at 100%+ for the next couple of years, and investments in capex should ensure an impressive growth rate through 2030.

Over the past three months, shares of AAPL are up 22% (Thursday’s close), compared with the Nasdaq, which is up 1%. That makes the 7% drop in shares following earnings and guidance more palatable. In after-hours trading, shares traded down 3% following the June quarter results, which overall were only slightly ahead of expectations. The stock dropped an additional 4% on the September guide, which called for revenue growth of 9–11%, compared with the Street at 12%. I believe the guide would have called for 15% if not for supply constraints and FX. Either way, numbers are going down, and that understandably doesn’t sit well with investors. I believe that in the weeks to come, investors will step back and realize the guide was actually favorable relative to expectations. P.S. Don’t forget we may get a foldable iPhone this fall.

Our X poll found that only about 17% of US iPhone users use Siri daily, a low number considering the phone on average is interacted with a hundred-plus times a day. Today it's used for low-stakes tasks and not trusted as an assistant. Over the next year, that will begin to change with the new Siri expected to be available late this year in the US through an iOS 27 update. We found the feature to be slow in our beta testing over the past 20 days, which was more than offset by an AI assistant that just works. Ultimately, I believe the use of Siri, which is core to Apple's personalized AI, will be the foundation of the Apple devices' value proposition.

Google’s June quarter should have worked. Cloud revenue was up 82% y/y versus the Street at 63%. My first reaction was the stock should be up 5%. Instead, shares fell 7% in the two trading days following the print compared to the Nasdaq down 3%. The reason is investors are still stuck on the same two issues: capex and cloud margins. The company raised CY26 capex expectations by about 7% relative to the Street's and said significant investment will continue. On top of that, cloud margins are likely to decline in the back half of the year as Google uses third-party capacity to meet demand. My take is the capex and margin concerns are real near-term, but the more important point is that cloud demand is still running well ahead of supply.

Shares of TSLA were down 16% over the two days following the company's June results compared to the Nasdaq down 3%. The pressure came from two places: automotive gross margins and capex. Auto gross margins ex credits came in at 16.3%, below the Street at 18.5% and below the adjusted March quarter run rate of around 18%, breaking a five-quarter upward margin trend. The second issue is the company expects capex in 2027 to be “massive,” suggesting the Street's $21B estimate will be above $25B, pushing operating cash flow negative for the next six quarters. I believe those two issues are near-term in nature. The company will still have between $20B and $25B in cash at the end of 2027 compared to the $43.5B reported today (Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments), and most importantly is investing in high-growth, high-barrier-to-entry markets around physical AI.